Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A recent philanthropic movement with advocates among high-profile tech entrepreneurs and philosophers, effective altruism (EA) has been widely disparaged for its flawed moral philosophy and conservative political implications. As philanthropic practice, however, it has been seldom studied. In this paper, we argue that claims to technoscientific expertise are central to how EA actors understand, legitimize, and take part in the production of philanthropic value. We analyze their practices of categorization, ranking and measurement as well as underlying technoscientific imaginaries and moral views through comparing three areas of EA intervention: neglected tropical diseases, cultured meat, and AI safety. We show how EA involves various and contested ambitions to direct knowledge production and redraw the boundaries of expert communities, shedding light on the centrality of technoscience in philanthropists’ worldmaking ambitions.

Original publication

DOI

10.1080/03085147.2024.2439715

Type

Journal

Economy and Society

Publication Date

01/01/2025