Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Reactogenicity, the occurrence of vaccine side effects, can impact vaccine acceptance. There is limited data comparing the reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines to other routinely used vaccines, such as the meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY). In a trial of UK adults, participants received a third COVID-19 vaccine dose (NVX-CoV2373, BNT162b2, or mRNA1273) alongside MenACWY as an active control. Compared to MenACWY, we found that mRNA vaccines, particularly mRNA1273, showed the greatest relative increase in side effects, while protein-based NVX-CoV2373 generally elicited similar reactogenicity to MenACWY. These findings suggest that platform type can influence vaccine reactogenicity, and further research is needed to compare COVID-19 vaccines with other routinely administered vaccines.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126569

Type

Journal

Vaccine

Publication Date

12/01/2025

Volume

44

Keywords

COVID-19, MenACWY, Meningococcus, Reactogenicity, Vaccine, Humans, Meningococcal Vaccines, Male, Adult, Female, United Kingdom, COVID-19 Vaccines, COVID-19, Middle Aged, SARS-CoV-2, mRNA Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Young Adult, Vaccines, Conjugate, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Immunization, Secondary